Future Redbirds

Relievers, relievers, relievers

25 Responses to “Relievers, relievers, relievers”

1. 

   sluhser, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:09 pm Said:

   Both Melville and Friedrich…..If Melville is there in the sandwich do you fork up the money for him?
2. 

   poorcollegeguy, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:11 pm Said:

   i would, if hes there
3. 

   erik, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:16 pm Said:

   slusher-yes, but I think SD pops him right now. Friedrich that is.
4. 

   Jim Mense, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:17 pm Said:

   Pay what you must for a good sandwich.
5. 

   PJ, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:19 pm Said:

   Odorizzi!
6. 

   Big Steve, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:19 pm Said:

   Not San Diego.
7. 

   poorcollegeguy, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:21 pm Said:

   i guess scouts were a lot more concerned with his control than what we thought. i can believe he hasnt been taken.
8. 

   poorcollegeguy, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:21 pm Said:

   that was supposed to say “CANT believe”
9. 

   bsbalbrian, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:44 pm Said:

   how ’bout a thread on pick 39?
10. 

    erik, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:45 pm Said:

    Oh, there will be talk. I’m resting a little. heh.
11. 

    Swirls_AEPi, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:46 pm Said:

    It looks like we might have a shot at Odorizzi or Melville in the supp. round at this point, which is absolutely shocking!
12. 

    cpebbles, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:46 pm Said:

    It’s getting more and more likely that Melville, Odorizzi, and/or Collier is sitting there at 39.
13. 

    bsbalbrian, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:49 pm Said:

    erik,
    no intention to make you work any harder than you already are. i appreciate all the work. you and the others here at this site have made this draft exciting. thanks.
14. 

    cpebbles, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:49 pm Said:

    Indians spring on the felon.
15. 

    Phil, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:50 pm Said:

    My vote is for Collier
16. 

    poorcollegeguy, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:52 pm Said:

    Mine is for any of the 3 guys, collier being my fav, just please let it be a high schooler, after taking the sure thing at 13 use 39 for a high risk high reward.
17. 

    Jon Douthit, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:52 pm Said:

    agreed. Thanks so much for all the work you guys are putting in on coverage.
18. 

    PJ, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:57 pm Said:

    Any of the 3 would be gold

    Hunt and Scheppers are also both available, correct?
19. 

    Toddy, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:57 pm Said:

    How about Gillaspie? The guy can rake, and is a candidate to switch to 2B. . .a Wallace/Gillaspie front end of the draft would create ripples in the NL Central around 2010.
20. 

    cpebbles, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:58 pm Said:

    I’m not crazy about Collier myself. His power will be limited because he’s so early on his weight transfer and I think you have to reconstruct his entire swing to fix that problem.
21. 

    PJ, on June 5th, 2008 at 3:58 pm Said:

    I realize Scheppers is injured. Any word on Hunt?
22. 

    cpebbles, on June 5th, 2008 at 4:00 pm Said:

    I don’t like Gillaspie either. College 3Bs don’t transition to pro 2Bs, and I don’t think you put a supplemental pick into a guy who might work out and be Bill Mueller.
23. 

    poorcollegeguy, on June 5th, 2008 at 4:01 pm Said:

    Id rather take a HS player with the pick, but hunt and scheppers, i wouldnt complain much.
24. 

    Todd, on June 5th, 2008 at 4:05 pm Said:

    I’ve seen Gillaspie play a couple of times, and I don’t like him much, either. Mueller is a good comparison, as when he was healthy he was a good line drive hitter, but really only had a couple good MLB seasons. I don’t see Gillaspie as a big league 3B - not enough power. I would like Gillaspie in the 3d or 4th round, but not as high as people have been talking.
25. 

    Nick, on June 5th, 2008 at 4:05 pm Said:

    We are ten picks out from the Supp pick. Anybody have a list of their ten best available at this point?

    I’ll start:

    Melville
    Odirizzi
    Collier
    ???