Comments on: Daily Farm Report 4/5/08 http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/ Baseball's Future in the Gateway City Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:27:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: alex http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15681 alex Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:57:22 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15681 "power at a given position" is keeping John Olerud from being a viable Hall of Fame candidate. “power at a given position” is keeping John Olerud from being a viable Hall of Fame candidate.

]]>
By: azruavatar http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15667 azruavatar Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:43:02 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15667 phinstd -- duly noted on Zimmermann's name. I misspelled the last name and they have Rob listed on his MiLB player page. Will change. Nick -- you're right that's a lefty but I don't recognize them. . . Hamilton maybe? phinstd — duly noted on Zimmermann’s name. I misspelled the last name and they have Rob listed on his MiLB player page. Will change.

Nick — you’re right that’s a lefty but I don’t recognize them. . . Hamilton maybe?

]]>
By: Ryan http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15666 Ryan Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:29:34 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15666 Daryl Jones anyone? Daryl Jones anyone?

]]>
By: Nick http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15665 Nick Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:58:08 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15665 That isn't a pic of Allan Craig. Craig is #5 and bat righthanded. Got his autograph on a Bowman Card yesterday at the game, very nice guy. That isn’t a pic of Allan Craig. Craig is #5 and bat righthanded. Got his autograph on a Bowman Card yesterday at the game, very nice guy.

]]>
By: siddfynch http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15664 siddfynch Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:18:23 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15664 Regarding Pitts' comment: Maybe he just means that Cruz is better suited to play C than 3B, hence that is why his "ceiling" is higher. Offensive production was only a part of what Pitts appeared to be considering. Regarding Pitts’ comment:

Maybe he just means that Cruz is better suited to play C than 3B, hence that is why his “ceiling” is higher. Offensive production was only a part of what Pitts appeared to be considering.

]]>
By: siddfynch http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15663 siddfynch Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:16:09 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15663 Regarding target production levels or hitting "types" at certain positions: Opportunity cost. That is why people look for production levels or "types" out of specific positions. Conitinuing with Daric Barton as an example, he may indeed reach some threshold of absolute production without ever becoming a raging power hitter....but his production would be relatively easy to find in someone who also was able to defensively handle LF/RF/3B.....thus allowing the Ryan Howards, Prince Fielders, and Mark McGwires to occupy the 1B spot. If you have no Howard, Fielder, McGwire, then no worries....but as soon as you do, then there becomes opportunity cost. Regarding target production levels or hitting “types” at certain positions:

Opportunity cost. That is why people look for production levels or “types” out of specific positions. Conitinuing with Daric Barton as an example, he may indeed reach some threshold of absolute production without ever becoming a raging power hitter….but his production would be relatively easy to find in someone who also was able to defensively handle LF/RF/3B…..thus allowing the Ryan Howards, Prince Fielders, and Mark McGwires to occupy the 1B spot.

If you have no Howard, Fielder, McGwire, then no worries….but as soon as you do, then there becomes opportunity cost.

]]>
By: KCardinal http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15662 KCardinal Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:57:52 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15662 phin, Did you remember seeing at the beginning of ST how Luhnow, other minor league associates, and even Mo, made a trip down to the Dominican to let all of the agents/players know that they were in the market for serious talent, and going to be bigger players? It was early in ST, but I was excited. I imagine we'll see some bigger-named signees this year. The minors sure are getting a lot more fun to watch. phin,

Did you remember seeing at the beginning of ST how Luhnow, other minor league associates, and even Mo, made a trip down to the Dominican to let all of the agents/players know that they were in the market for serious talent, and going to be bigger players? It was early in ST, but I was excited.

I imagine we’ll see some bigger-named signees this year. The minors sure are getting a lot more fun to watch.

]]>
By: phinstd http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15661 phinstd Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:56:14 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15661 I had written off Solano, but if he takes a turn for the better this year it would serve two purposes: Bring us another IF prospect to watch out for (obviously). Start to show some promise and ROI for the Latin camps. With as hard as it seems to be at times to get DeWitt to open his DeWallet, we need the players we do sign from the Latin camps make some progress to convince upper management how important our investments in that area can be. (This is my theory anyway) I had written off Solano, but if he takes a turn for the better this year it would serve two purposes:

Bring us another IF prospect to watch out for (obviously).

Start to show some promise and ROI for the Latin camps. With as hard as it seems to be at times to get DeWitt to open his DeWallet, we need the players we do sign from the Latin camps make some progress to convince upper management how important our investments in that area can be. (This is my theory anyway)

]]>
By: phinstd http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15660 phinstd Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:53:28 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15660 Just because I'm a Missouri St. honk...the name is Bob (not Rob) and his last name is spelled Zimmermann (with two N's). Of course, if he keeps getting lit up, it won't matter how he spells his name, or where he played in college. I'm not an Andrus fan because of his terrible plate discipline, and the line drive percentage he has, but he is a magician with the glove. Just because I’m a Missouri St. honk…the name is Bob (not Rob) and his last name is spelled Zimmermann (with two N’s). Of course, if he keeps getting lit up, it won’t matter how he spells his name, or where he played in college.

I’m not an Andrus fan because of his terrible plate discipline, and the line drive percentage he has, but he is a magician with the glove.

]]>
By: the red baron http://futureredbirds.com/2008/04/05/daily-farm-report-4508/#comment-15659 the red baron Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:40:15 +0000 http://futureredbirds.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-15659 fewgoodcards- The reason it's called an "inverted W", as opposed to an "M", (which would make just as much sense, really) is because there is also a "W" position that you can look for in mechanics. When a pitcher draws his elbows back toward each other, thus "loading" his scapulas, (shoulder blades) that's a "W" position, because, from above, it looks like the letter W. See if you can find an overhead shot of Jake Peavey mid delivery to see what I mean. When a pitcher does that same thing, but with his elbows above shoulder level, you still get a "W", but now it looks as if it's been flipped over. This is the position that seems to cause so many shoulder problems among Tom House devotees and Rice graduates, to name a few. In short, it's only called an "Inverted W", and not an "M" because there's already a "W" position, and the "inverted" form of it is a damaging variation of the same biomechanical action. fewgoodcards-

The reason it’s called an “inverted W”, as opposed to an “M”, (which would make just as much sense, really) is because there is also a “W” position that you can look for in mechanics.

When a pitcher draws his elbows back toward each other, thus “loading” his scapulas, (shoulder blades) that’s a “W” position, because, from above, it looks like the letter W. See if you can find an overhead shot of Jake Peavey mid delivery to see what I mean.

When a pitcher does that same thing, but with his elbows above shoulder level, you still get a “W”, but now it looks as if it’s been flipped over. This is the position that seems to cause so many shoulder problems among Tom House devotees and Rice graduates, to name a few.

In short, it’s only called an “Inverted W”, and not an “M” because there’s already a “W” position, and the “inverted” form of it is a damaging variation of the same biomechanical action.

]]>