• Amaury Marti Watch

    Amaury Marti is currently hitting .424/.509/.633 in 39 games for the Mexican Red Devils of the Mexican League, also known as Liga de Amaury Cazana. Bud Selig ordered the Cardinals to banish him to there, in fear of the major leagues losing competitive balance.

    Amaury also refuses to accept the watch curse. He has the power to curse, and the power to bless.

  •  

    November 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Oct   Dec »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  

  • RSS FirstInning.com: St. Louis Cardinals Daily Report

  • My del.icio.us

  • Flickr Photos

    lynn

    Shane peterson

    Louisville_Zack_Pitts_

    brettwallaceswing

    Jason Buursma

    More Photos

  • Visitors

    • 1,427,770 hits

  • Header design

    by Kurt Hunzeker
  • Google Reader or Homepage
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to My AOL
    Add to Technorati Favorites!

Reader Top 25, #17

Posted on November 28, 2007 by erik
  1. Rasmus
  2. Garcia
  3. Anderson
  4. Perez
  5. Ottavino
  6. Herron
  7. Mortensen
  8. Boggs
  9. Craig
  10. Kozma
  11. Jose Martinez
  12. P.J. Walters
  13. Hoffpauir
  14. Maiques
  15. Joe Mather
  16. Motte

Another very close vote, with Motte narrowly beating out Jon Jay 14-12. Some nice support for Jess Todd and Mark Hamilton being thrown in there as well, things are shaping up rather nicely.

Filed under: Top 25

« Yet even more Rule 5 thoughts A peak at peak translations part 4: pitchers »

45 Responses to “Reader Top 25, #17”

  1. jackson, on November 28th, 2007 at 10:37 pm Said:

    Hamilton- good trade bait

  2. Hugo, on November 28th, 2007 at 10:48 pm Said:

    Jon Jay

  3. charlie, on November 28th, 2007 at 10:51 pm Said:

    Jonathan Jay

  4. TimJ, on November 28th, 2007 at 11:06 pm Said:

    Jay

  5. Todd, on November 28th, 2007 at 11:20 pm Said:

    Jay

  6. DriverZn, on November 28th, 2007 at 11:40 pm Said:

    Jay

    Next in my line is Todd

  7. JimH, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:42 am Said:

    Steve Hill, He hit a ton in his first go around

  8. JimH, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:44 am Said:

    I already voted, but shouldn’t Tyler Norrick’s name come up pretty soon?

  9. mateodh, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:44 am Said:

    Hamilton.

  10. Kilgore, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:45 am Said:

    Mr. Todd

  11. JB, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:55 am Said:

    i think todd and dew are really comparable so far, with dew getting slightly better results in a smaller sample size. dew also mostly pitched 1-2 innings at a time while todd went a bit deeper into his games and even started some. my vote is for todd.

  12. tnek5, on November 29th, 2007 at 1:09 am Said:

    jay

  13. Ricky Vaughn, on November 29th, 2007 at 1:13 am Said:

    Descalso, the best hitter taken in the 2007 draft deserves a little credit

  14. cariocacardinal, on November 29th, 2007 at 5:00 am Said:

    hamilton

  15. JMedwick, on November 29th, 2007 at 7:42 am Said:

    Jay

  16. BigJawnMize, on November 29th, 2007 at 8:00 am Said:

    Jay

  17. lawless, on November 29th, 2007 at 8:11 am Said:

    McCormick

  18. Paul, on November 29th, 2007 at 8:24 am Said:

    Hamilton!

    How has he dropped this far?

  19. Hugo, on November 29th, 2007 at 8:36 am Said:

    I find it interesting how our voting list differs from Az and Erik’s lists:
    1-7 are exactly the same on all 3
    at 8 we have Boggs, Erik has him 10, Az 12
    at 9 we have Craig, 11 and 9
    at 10 we have Koz 8 and 16
    at 11 we have Martinez 18 and 17
    at 12 we have PJ 17 and 10
    at 13 we have Hoff 13 and 11
    at 14 we have Maiques 9 and 13
    at 15 we have Mather 16 and 15
    at 16 we have Motte 14 and 8

    In their top 16 Hamilton (12 and 14) Todd (15 and 18) have yet to be ranked in the vote.

    So it seems the community is higher on Boggs and Martinez then the bloggers, we seem to agree on Craig, Hoff and Mather. On the others we are close to one of them but not the other.

  20. Luke W, on November 29th, 2007 at 8:49 am Said:

    Todd

  21. sluhser, on November 29th, 2007 at 9:27 am Said:

    Hamilton

  22. Double A, on November 29th, 2007 at 9:37 am Said:

    Hamilton

  23. Nick, on November 29th, 2007 at 9:39 am Said:

    Hamilton

  24. Brady, on November 29th, 2007 at 10:00 am Said:

    Jess Todd

  25. BGT, on November 29th, 2007 at 10:32 am Said:

    Todd

  26. Seth City, on November 29th, 2007 at 10:44 am Said:

    JJ

  27. phil, on November 29th, 2007 at 11:30 am Said:

    Jess Todd

  28. Carlos, on November 29th, 2007 at 11:43 am Said:

    Jay

  29. nedflanders, on November 29th, 2007 at 11:56 am Said:

    Hamilton

  30. arch support, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:07 pm Said:

    Jay

  31. nomar34, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:22 pm Said:

    Looks like Jay is going to get it and my vote wont change that so why not jump on the band wagon!

  32. Chris, on November 29th, 2007 at 12:24 pm Said:

    I’ll go with Hamilton again. It is close for between him and Jay.

  33. JD, on November 29th, 2007 at 1:04 pm Said:

    Hamilton

  34. Silent George, on November 29th, 2007 at 1:56 pm Said:

    Todd

  36. haltz, on November 29th, 2007 at 2:19 pm Said:

    Hamilton

  37. Grant, on November 29th, 2007 at 2:40 pm Said:

    Todd

  38. Jeffery, on November 29th, 2007 at 3:39 pm Said:

    Jay

  39. easy, on November 29th, 2007 at 4:29 pm Said:

    Jay. He was outstanding his first half year and had injuries that may excuse last year’s performance.

  40. cardsfan1, on November 29th, 2007 at 4:49 pm Said:

    jon jay

  41. Travis, on November 29th, 2007 at 5:37 pm Said:

    Todd

  42. jonesin, on November 29th, 2007 at 5:55 pm Said:

    Paul –

    Hamilton’s AFL struggles are a big reason why he’s not been picked yet

  43. JDod, on November 29th, 2007 at 6:54 pm Said:

    Jon Jay

  44. houstoncardinal, on November 29th, 2007 at 7:28 pm Said:

    Mather

  45. houstoncardinal, on November 29th, 2007 at 7:29 pm Said:

    oops. don’t know where my brain was w/ that Mather choice. Let’s say Hamilton

Leave a Reply