Comments on: Prospect Profile: Adam Ottavino http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/ Baseball's Future in the Gateway City Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:22:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: erik http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8069 erik Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:38:54 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8069 lou--it is a severe pitchers park. per boyd nation, it was a 75 between 2003-2006...that's just nuts. however, i'd be pretty confident the cardinals are aware of this. lou–it is a severe pitchers park. per boyd nation, it was a 75 between 2003-2006…that’s just nuts. however, i’d be pretty confident the cardinals are aware of this.

]]>
By: Lou Schuler http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8068 Lou Schuler Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:13:24 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8068 Two thoughts about Ottavino specifically: A poster on another board, who called himself Redbirdinsight, described himself as someone involved in player development for the Cardinals in Jupiter. He struck me as genuine, and the board's moderators vouched that he was what he said he was. He said Ott's problem wasn't with the grip on his fastball, but on his inability to throw first-pitch strikes. He had high praise for Adam's stuff, but said he hadn't yet learned to pitch like a professional. It seems to me that he's still young enough to learn to harness his stuff, but I don't know enough about player development to know if there's a specific window of opportunity for pitchers to learn this, or if it's an unpredictable learning curve. I know that Koufax guy took a while but eventually got the hang of it. Other guys, like Greg Maddux, seemed to be born with it. One more thought: Ottavino came out of Northeastern. I read a while ago that Northeastern's baseball field is one of the most extreme pitching-friendly environments in all of college baseball. I wonder if that affected his development. I also wonder if Luhnow's stats-focused staff took that into consideration when they drafted him. Two thoughts about Ottavino specifically:

A poster on another board, who called himself Redbirdinsight, described himself as someone involved in player development for the Cardinals in Jupiter. He struck me as genuine, and the board’s moderators vouched that he was what he said he was.

He said Ott’s problem wasn’t with the grip on his fastball, but on his inability to throw first-pitch strikes. He had high praise for Adam’s stuff, but said he hadn’t yet learned to pitch like a professional.

It seems to me that he’s still young enough to learn to harness his stuff, but I don’t know enough about player development to know if there’s a specific window of opportunity for pitchers to learn this, or if it’s an unpredictable learning curve. I know that Koufax guy took a while but eventually got the hang of it. Other guys, like Greg Maddux, seemed to be born with it.

One more thought:

Ottavino came out of Northeastern. I read a while ago that Northeastern’s baseball field is one of the most extreme pitching-friendly environments in all of college baseball.

I wonder if that affected his development.

I also wonder if Luhnow’s stats-focused staff took that into consideration when they drafted him.

]]>
By: Lou Schuler http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8066 Lou Schuler Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:02:25 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8066 I'm confused about the idea that Tony and Dave Duncan were dictating how our players developed in the minors. On the one hand, we're told that Walt lost control over the minors entirely, and had no say over anyone who wasn't on the 40-man roster. So if it's true that Jeff Luhnow was/is in charge of scouting, drafting, and development, then it must be Luhnow's idea to put so much emphasis on the 2-seam fastball. Conversely, I suppose it could be true that Luhnow's policy was a nod to Tony and Dunc's preference for sinking fastballs. Which would suggest, I think, that Luhnow had a line of communication with Tony and Dave that went around Walt. Or maybe they communicated telepathically. Anyway, until someone says otherwise, I'm going to assume the pitching policy is Luhnow's preference and remains in place. I’m confused about the idea that Tony and Dave Duncan were dictating how our players developed in the minors.

On the one hand, we’re told that Walt lost control over the minors entirely, and had no say over anyone who wasn’t on the 40-man roster. So if it’s true that Jeff Luhnow was/is in charge of scouting, drafting, and development, then it must be Luhnow’s idea to put so much emphasis on the 2-seam fastball.

Conversely, I suppose it could be true that Luhnow’s policy was a nod to Tony and Dunc’s preference for sinking fastballs. Which would suggest, I think, that Luhnow had a line of communication with Tony and Dave that went around Walt.

Or maybe they communicated telepathically.

Anyway, until someone says otherwise, I’m going to assume the pitching policy is Luhnow’s preference and remains in place.

]]>
By: DriverZn http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8046 DriverZn Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:55:44 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8046 I have wondered the same thing. If Tony goes but Duncan stays since he is under contract for next year. What does that mean for the young pitching? I have no idea myself. I have wondered the same thing. If Tony goes but Duncan stays since he is under contract for next year. What does that mean for the young pitching? I have no idea myself.

]]>
By: tnek5 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8040 tnek5 Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:42:08 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8040 Hopefully now that Walt and probably Tony are gone i'm interesed to see were the cardinals start going with starting pitching in the minor leagues. Also, hopefully we can give reyes another chance by letting him pitch the way he wants to. I'm hoping Ottavino will be able to focus on his strengths and maybe improve upon his 2006 numbers. If Tony leaves what will happen to Duncan? Hopefully now that Walt and probably Tony are gone i’m interesed to see were the cardinals start going with starting pitching in the minor leagues. Also, hopefully we can give reyes another chance by letting him pitch the way he wants to. I’m hoping Ottavino will be able to focus on his strengths and maybe improve upon his 2006 numbers. If Tony leaves what will happen to Duncan?

]]>
By: cariocacardinal http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8037 cariocacardinal Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:53:21 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8037 At what point does the age issue with Norrick go away? AA? AAA? The age issue to me is only relevant to the number of years you can be productive as a pro (which he's a long way from worrying about that), the extent that your physical maturity is allowing you to dominate others and limits your improvement, and the extent your experience mental maturity does the same thing. For the last two, I think it is different for every player. Does anybody have any first hand experience (or even second or third hand for that matter) that indicate what role Norrick's physical and mental maturity are playing in his success? Is it helping a lot or is it a non-factor? At what point does the age issue with Norrick go away? AA? AAA? The age issue to me is only relevant to the number of years you can be productive as a pro (which he’s a long way from worrying about that), the extent that your physical maturity is allowing you to dominate others and limits your improvement, and the extent your experience mental maturity does the same thing. For the last two, I think it is different for every player. Does anybody have any first hand experience (or even second or third hand for that matter) that indicate what role Norrick’s physical and mental maturity are playing in his success? Is it helping a lot or is it a non-factor?

]]>
By: fewgoodcards http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8033 fewgoodcards Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:22:12 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8033 i too fear the lambert-esque move to AA, but one thing to think about lambert is that he lost quite a bit of his stuff when he moved to pro ball. ottavino has maintained his stuff and maybe even added a tick or two to the fastball. sure he needs to work on his control, but you can get away with a little more when you are sitting 92-94 with movement like ottavino instead of 88-90 like lambert. i too fear the lambert-esque move to AA, but one thing to think about lambert is that he lost quite a bit of his stuff when he moved to pro ball. ottavino has maintained his stuff and maybe even added a tick or two to the fastball. sure he needs to work on his control, but you can get away with a little more when you are sitting 92-94 with movement like ottavino instead of 88-90 like lambert.

]]>
By: erik http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8016 erik Sat, 06 Oct 2007 03:56:17 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8016 lawless...actually, mckamey gave ott a 8d going into this past season, garcia 8c. garcia has a plus curve and sinker, i wouldn't say he's behind in ottavino in terms of stuff. the high K+GB combo is a pretty nice recipe. good call on norrick, their numbers are pretty close together. both have nearly as high of K%, BB%. norrick's babip makes him look flukier, and ottavino gets more grounders. and ottavino is nearly two years younger. lawless…actually, mckamey gave ott a 8d going into this past season, garcia 8c. garcia has a plus curve and sinker, i wouldn’t say he’s behind in ottavino in terms of stuff. the high K+GB combo is a pretty nice recipe.

good call on norrick, their numbers are pretty close together. both have nearly as high of K%, BB%. norrick’s babip makes him look flukier, and ottavino gets more grounders. and ottavino is nearly two years younger.

]]>
By: houstoncardinal http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8015 houstoncardinal Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:26:38 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8015 I've always like Ottavino, much more than I ever liked Lambert. I think his roller-coaster season this year was at least partly attributable to the battle over the 2 seamer. I can't help but wonder what will happen to the 2-seamer battle now that Walt is gone and how that might affect Ottavino next year. I’ve always like Ottavino, much more than I ever liked Lambert. I think his roller-coaster season this year was at least partly attributable to the battle over the 2 seamer. I can’t help but wonder what will happen to the 2-seamer battle now that Walt is gone and how that might affect Ottavino next year.

]]>
By: lawless http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8010 lawless Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:45:34 +0000 http://futureredbirds.com/2007/10/04/prospect-profile-adam-ottavino/#comment-8010 Nice report... With Ottavino I think I am suffering a bit from C. Lambert disease. He has nice stuff, but until he succeeds at AA I won't be sold. I also hope that the change is there as he says. If so, he could be a really interesting prospect. I would say the ceiling is higher than Jaime, but the likelihood of reaching it is lower. Maybe a 9E vs. Jaime's 8C (using McKamey ratings)... You just have to love the FBall... When you look at pure numbers Norrick looks just as good if not better imho... Nice report…

With Ottavino I think I am suffering a bit from C. Lambert disease. He has nice stuff, but until he succeeds at AA I won’t be sold. I also hope that the change is there as he says. If so, he could be a really interesting prospect. I would say the ceiling is higher than Jaime, but the likelihood of reaching it is lower. Maybe a 9E vs. Jaime’s 8C (using McKamey ratings)…

You just have to love the FBall… When you look at pure numbers Norrick looks just as good if not better imho…

]]>